20.3 C
London
Saturday, May 25, 2024

Amendment to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and the Senate's amendment regarding neo-judges. Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram and Bartłomiej Przymusiński comment

Must read

- Advertisement -


Today, when we are rebuilding the justice system, we cannot base the National Council of the Judiciary on people who had flexible spines and who were promoted at that time – said judge Bartłomiej Przymusiński in “Fakty po Faktach”, commenting on the amendment to the National Council of the Judiciary Act proposed by parliament. Attorney Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram admitted that she “hopes that the voice of the judicial community will be heard” and talks on the regulations will be resumed.

On Thursday, the Senate supported the amendment to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary, along with amendments, according to which all judges in Poland, and not the Sejm, will elect 15 judge members of the National Council of the Judiciary. The Senate also voted in favor of an amendment to allow candidates for the National Council of the Judiciary to be the so-called neo-judges, i.e. appointed after those made by PIS changes in the Council in December 2017. This was met with criticism from associations of judges and prosecutors.

SEE ALSO: Dispute over amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary

“Values ​​cannot be traded”

- Advertisement -

Attorney Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram from the “Free Courts” Initiative and judge Bartłomiej Przymusiński from the Association of Polish Judges “Iustitia” talked about the assumptions of the bill passed by the Senate in “Fakty po Faktach” on TVN24.

Przymusiński said that he “does not know why it happened” that the Senate decided on such an amendment. – Perhaps this is the result of some political bargaining and we are very surprised because values ​​cannot be traded. Values ​​are there to be defended, and I think that's what the entire history of the last eight years has been about, that values ​​are worth defending, he emphasized.

He pointed out that “today, when we are rebuilding the justice system, when we want to provide people with efficient, stable and fair courts, we cannot base the National Council of the Judiciary on people who had flexible spines and who were promoted at that time”, because the effect of this amendment is that, for example, people like you can get into the National Council of the Judiciary (Małgorzata) Manowska are you (Kamil) Zaradkiewicz.

Read also: The Venice Commission welcomed the amendment to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary. Adam Bodnar “thank you for your trust”

Another new act on the National Council of the Judiciary? Gregorczyk-Abram: what alternative do we have?

Gregorczyk-Abram said that she “very much hopes that the voice of the judicial community will be listened to by the Ministry of Justice.” She admitted that the Sejm cannot change the amendment already adopted by the upper house, but – she said – “she expects that the community will be listened to and these talks will open again with the possibility of taking into account the demands of the elderly community.”

When asked whether this meant that the law would be written from scratch, the lawyer replied: – What alternative do we have?

According to her, we either accept the bill in its entirety or “you can reject the Senate amendment.” She noted that “we have no guarantee” that the president will Andrzej Duda will sign the amendment, even with this provision.

Another new act on the National Council of the Judiciary? Gregorczyk-Abram: what alternative do we have?TVN24

Main photo source: TVN24



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article