12.6 C
Monday, May 20, 2024

Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Chat GPT. The writers filed a lawsuit against OpenAI

Must read

- Advertisement -

Canadian writer Mona Awad and American writer Paul Tremblay have filed a lawsuit against the OpenAI company that created ChatGPT. Authors say copyright was broken by using their books to “train” artificial intelligence (AI) tools, The Guardian reported.

Awad and Tremblay believe their books have been unlawfully “absorbed” and “used to train” ChatGPT because the chatbot generates “very accurate summaries” of their novels, according to the lawsuit filed by the writers. Sample summaries are included as evidence.

Writers Sue OpenAI for ChatGPT

According to Andres Guadamuz of the University of Sussex, this is the first copyright lawsuit against ChatGPT. He adds that thanks to it, the “limits of legality” of activities in the field of artificial intelligence will be explored.

- Advertisement -

Books make ideal large-scale models for language training because they tend to contain “high-quality, well-crafted prose,” lawyers for the writers Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick told the Guardian.

Awad and Tremblay claimed in the lawsuit that OpenAI “unfairly” profits from “stolen texts and ideas” and called for financial damages on behalf of all authors in the USAwhose work was allegedly used to train ChatGPT. While authors of copyrighted works have a large legal umbrella over them, they are confronted by companies such as Open AI “who behave as if these laws do not apply to them,” commented Saveri and Butterick.

Chances of a lawsuit

However, it can be difficult to prove that writers suffered financial harm due to ChatGPT training using copyrighted material. ChatGPT can work “exactly the same way” even if it hasn’t “consumed” the novel, because it is trained on the great wealth of information on the internet, including discussions of users who have read the books, Guadamuz believes.

Artificial intelligence will soon be the same as digital music, TV and movies, and will have to respect copyright, writers’ lawyers say.

They also noted that it is “ironic” that “so-called artificial intelligence” tools rely on human-created data. “Their systems depend entirely on human creativity. If they bankrupt human creators, they will soon bankrupt themselves, Saveri and Butterick believe.

Main photo source: T. Schneider / Shutterstock

Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article