14.3 C
Sunday, June 23, 2024

Australia. Kathleen Folbigg convicted of killing her own children may be acquitted

Must read

- Advertisement -

In the light of new scientific evidence, there are reasonable doubts about Kathleen Folbigg’s guilt in the deaths of her four children, the Australian Public Prosecutor’s Office said on Wednesday. The woman is currently serving a sentence of at least 25 years in prison. Now scientists have shown that the children may have died as a result of rare genetic mutations.

In 2003, Folbigg, now 55, was found guilty of the murders of her three children – 19-month-old Laura, 10-month-old Sarah and 8-month-old Patrick – between 1991 and 1999. The court also found the woman guilty of causing the death (in this case, the act was not classified as murder – ed.) of her fourth child, Caleb, who died in 1989 at the age of only 19 days. Folbigg, from Newcastle, was sentenced to a minimum of 25 years in prison.

The Australian woman assured her innocence all the time, and her children died of the so-called Cot death is the sudden death of an apparently healthy infant, which usually occurs during sleep. The woman repeatedly sought acquittal, but the requests made by her lawyers were rejected. A few years ago, however, scientific opinions emerged that prompted investigators to reconsider the case.

Kathleen FolbiggReuters/Forums

- Advertisement -

SEE ALSO: He escaped from prison, barricaded himself in his house. The 22-year-old died in a fire during an exchange of fire with police

Australia. Mother convicted of killing her own children

On Wednesday, April 26, Sally Dowling, New South State’s Attorney’s Office Wales In a statement, it said there was “reasonable doubt as to Folbigg’s guilt” in light of the new evidence. If the now retired Judge Tom Bathurst, who presided over the trial more than 20 years ago, also finds the woman’s guilt in doubt, he can order the local governor to pardon her. He could also ask the Court of Appeal to consider overturning the convictions, explains Sky News.

The media emphasize that the Folbigg case was circumstantial from the beginning, as there were no physical signs of a homicide. During the trial, however, the prosecutor told the jury that “lightning doesn’t strike the same place four times.” And the pathologists interviewed during the trial said they had never met a family with more than one case of infant death, the Sydney Morning Herald writes.

As explained by Sky News, in 2018, scientists investigated the case, who showed that at least two deaths are linked to a rare genetic mutation affecting the work of the heart. That discovery did not lead to a change of sentence, however, in 2021, a group of 90 Australian researchers launched a petition for Folbigg’s acquittal. In November last year, based on their arguments, the investigation was resumed.

Kathleen Folbigg may be acquitted

At Wednesday’s hearing, the defense said there was “convincing scientific evidence” that “neurogenetic disorders” were responsible for the remaining deaths. The prosecutor’s office, as reported by Sky News, reminded that Folbigg’s confession was also supposed to be in her diary. Expert psychologists and psychiatrists, however, said that the 55-year-old woman was “in mourning” after the deaths of her children, so the notes of remorse cannot be interpreted as confessions to the murders.

SEE ALSO: The bodies of eight people have been found in a “tourist paradise”. They are hidden near the airport

Sky News, “Sydney Morning Herald”

Main photo source: Reuters/Forums

Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article