The tradition secretary is predicted to stipulate what he claims are the advantages of Channel 4’s privatisation, arguing that the “much-needed funding” will assist the broadcaster compete with streaming companies like Netflix and Amazon.
In a speech on the Royal Tv Society Conference at the moment, Oliver Dowden will acknowledge that the channel is at the moment “in a steady place” however will say that it wants more money if it desires to develop.
Mr Dowden is predicted to say that the money can both come “on the again of the taxpayer” or from personal funding.
“It is my robust place – as some extent of precept – that I don’t consider the borrowing of a business TV channel must be underwritten by a granny in Stockport or Southend,” he’ll say.
The community just lately introduced its best-ever annual outcomes after a restoration in promoting revenues and a discount in spending left it in a powerful monetary place.
Mr Dowden will reiterate that Channel 4’s standing as a public service broadcaster will likely be protected within the occasion of a sale.
He stated the community would proceed to mirror trendy Britain and preserve its dedication to impartial information and present affairs, together with commissioning programming from the impartial manufacturing sector.
“Channel 4 can proceed to do what it does greatest: to fund unique, risk-taking content material – the sort you would not get wherever else – and to showcase the easiest of this nation on free-to-view tv,” he’ll add.
His feedback observe warnings from Channel 4 that there’s “no proof” that its privatisation will profit British audiences and may very well “trigger them hurt”.
The federal government is operating a session on plans to privatise the broadcaster, which might be offered to a non-public purchaser.
Channel 4 is state-owned however receives no public funding, with greater than 90% of its income coming from adverts.
“The proof means that continued public possession of Channel 4 would create the best circumstances not solely to beat the viewers and aggressive challenges the federal government has rightly recognized, but additionally to make sure that public service broadcasting within the UK continues to thrive,” the community stated in its submission to the session.
Shifting Channel 4 into personal possession may result in “lowered range and high quality of content material for UK viewers”, the broadcaster stated.
The community accused the session of failing to stipulate alternate options that might bolster it, akin to updating laws on public service prominence to use throughout digital platforms and reviewing business relationships between platforms and publishers.