Through the handoff between their respective applications, the liberal hosts agreed that, though Irving had the private selection on deciding whether or not or to not take the vaccine, he would nonetheless need to “undergo the implications” of not doing what was good for the “collective objective” of his staff.
Irving, whose refusal to reveal his vaccination standing made nationwide headlines, was banned this week by the Brooklyn Nets from taking part in any staff actions, together with practices and video games, till he’s absolutely vaccinated.
“Everybody has a selection. If he doesn’t wish to do it, effective. Then he doesn’t need to do it, however one then should undergo the implications of not doing it,” Lemon mentioned. “I believe within the largest scope of all of this, it’s all about America. Proper? Humanity. We’re all one staff, humanity. We’re imagined to be looking for one another as a staff and as a staff you don’t simply look out for what’s simply good for you.”
“You need to look out at what’s good for the entire, which is a staff, which is America, which is humanity, which is Kyrie Irving’s staff,” Lemon added. “He can’t say that is my private factor and nonetheless be part of that staff as a result of that’s not what is nice for the collective objective of the staff.”
Cuomo expressed his settlement with Lemon but additionally his disapproval of experiences that Irving was selecting to not take the vaccine as a protest over staff dropping their jobs for not complying with office vaccination mandates.
Each hosts agreed that if Irving was not anti-vaccination, even when he selected to not take the vaccine himself, he ought to nonetheless advocate for different staff to take it.
“You could have the precise to do one thing, doesn’t imply it’s proper the best way you are doing it. And that has simply been misplaced on this perverse sense of prerogative that hey, I’ve the liberty — you could have the liberty to stroll into site visitors. You understand, we don’t recommend you do it,” Cuomo mentioned.
“We have to have the ethical rectitude in our leaders that we demand of ourselves as Christians in our communities,” he added. “So that you’re not going to do one thing science tells you to do to maintain your self and others protected in your neighborhood out of some perverse sense of freedom simply since you don’t need to?”
“Chris, right here is the entire level. You do have the liberty to not — so then don’t do it. However then you definately can’t count on to do what everybody else does. You could have the liberty. And that’s what they’re telling him. You’ve got bought the liberty. We received’t cancel you or hearth you however you’re going to be benched,” Lemon chimed in.
Each hosts then agreed that it was “hypocritical” for folks standing up for Irving to not have stood up in the identical approach for Colin Kaepernick when he selected to protest racial injustice at NFL video games by kneeling through the Nationwide Anthem.