DEBATA Karol Nawrocki-RAFAŁ Trzaskowski. Who won – comments

“The best debate of Trzaskowski”, “A draw with an indication of Nawrocki” – participants of the discussion after the presidential debate on TVN24 assessed the speeches of Rafał Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki.

It took place on Friday Presidential debate between Rafał Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki.

– I have not seen moments when someone would “delete” someone, surprised something that would be a “game change”, a thread that causes a clear change in the lead – said Aleksandra Sobczak from “Gazeta Wyborcza”. “It seems to me that we are in a similar situation as before, that is, the situation is still very even,” she said.

The journalist of “Gazeta Wyborcza” pointed out that both candidates “spoke to the Mentzen electorate.” “They both clearly outdo each other in making promises or not raise the threads that could not like this Mentzen electorate,” she pointed out.

Sobczak added that she did not notice “bold threads addressed to people from the left and to the group that did not vote in the first round, and voted in earlier parliamentary elections and decided to win a democratic camp.”

Kuisz: It was the best substantive debate of Trzaskowski

– It was the best debate of this campaign, because in fact the candidates had to demonstrate knowledge of something more than just invective, which must be thrown out at the speed of a rifle – emphasized Jarosław Kisz from “Liberal Culture”.

The journalist assessed that “it was the best substantive debate” by Rafał Trzaskowski. – He could finally show that he knew something. It seems to me that it was a debate that showed two extreme personalities. On the one hand, there was the President of Warsaw and a European. On the other hand, Karol Nawrocki tried to present himself as an outsider – he pointed out.

Kuisz also mentioned that Rafał Trzaskowski avoided criticizing Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, whom he described as his “mentor who changed colors”. – Still, he refrained from attacking someone who was clearly deserved. It seems to me that it was a personality collision and programs clash – he added.

Michalski: Nawrocki “had more mishaps”

Patryk Michalski from Wirtualna Polska agreed with Jarosław Kuisz that for Rafał Trzaskowski it was the best debate. – In earlier debates he was tired, and here you were visible preparation and some idea of ​​the staffs – he assessed.

The journalist said that Karol Nawrocki “had more mishaps”. – especially the text about the fact that There was no war in Ukraine in 2015it was something that totally surprised me – he admitted.

Michalski mentioned that as a journalist he was in the east Ukraine And he watched “terrible effects”. – This is a fundamental thing when it comes to the future head of the armed forces. It is not possible that Karol Nawrocki, who explained that he meant a full -scale war, did not reserve it – he added.

Lubecka: a draw with a slight indication of Nawrocki

Beata Lubecka from Radio ZET said that neither Rafał Trzaskowski nor Karol Nawrocki convinced unconvinced. “They obviously convinced those who are already convinced,” she said.

Using the reference to sport, the journalist of Radio ZET said that “more often in the penalty area of ​​her rival was a candidate of Law and Justice and there were various fouls there.” – Then Rafał Trzaskowski also tried to enter this role, but Karol Nawrocki was more offensive in this respect – she said.

Lubecka pointed out that Karol Nawrocki repeated various messages, “that the viewer would remember that something was wrong with Rafał Trzaskowski.” When asked about how Rafał Trzaskowski managed, she commented: – He repelled the blows well.

“He can't be accused of lost this debate.” I think that this is a draw with a slight indication, for me, in Karol Nawrocki, but I think that his supporters can be delighted that he showed that he is tough, that it is impossible to bring to the ground floor – she added.

Pietryga: Both candidates have achieved some strategic goals

– There was no surprise. I did not expect that one of the candidates would knock out the other and today we would meet the winner. It was a draw, in my opinion – said Tomasz Pietryga from Rzeczpospolita. – Both candidates have achieved some strategic goals. Rafał Trzaskowski was criticized for being apathetic, tired, today he was fresh and it was indeed his best debate – he assessed.

He pointed out that Rafał Trzaskowski “gave up a conservative agenda.” – He did not pretend that he was not a liberal politician, but he tried to be natural. This, in turn, means that he gave up the confederation voters, knowing that they will not necessarily mostly be voters of Nawrocki – he added.

– As for Karol Nawrocki, he implemented the confederation agenda, he talked about Green Łada and Ukraine. His strategic goal is to maximize the confederation voters to himself and it seems to me that it is on the right track to do it – he added.

Sawczuk: Nawrocki surprised that he defended Grzegorz Braun

Tomasz Sawczuk from the Insight policy assessed that “both candidates had distributed accents differently to optimally direct the message to specific groups.” He stated that the President of Warsaw managed to “fall vigorously”.

– Here Nawrocki prepared himself as if Trzaskowski was to fall down sluggishly, and in the meantime he received a blow for a blow, so it was a clear contrast – he pointed out.

He stated that the candidate of the Civic Coalition addressed some of the confederation voters, “in particular those who care about free market economic views.” – It was especially visible when he emphasized Nawrocki's lack of competence in this respect – he added.

– In turn, Nawrocki spoke to those who are unlikely to take part in the elections and therefore emphasized that he was a candidate representing people from outside Warsaw, because we know that Sławomir Mentzen won among voters not voting in 2023 – he emphasized.

Sawczuk expressed the surprise that the candidate PIS “defended Grzegorz Braun's debate “. – Rafał Trzaskowski assumed that they were not his voters – he pointed out.