18.8 C
Sunday, May 26, 2024

Ferrari requests proper of evaluate over Sainz Australian GP penalty

Must read

- Advertisement -

The Spaniard was given a five-second penalty by the stewards for inflicting a collision with Fernando Alonso on the chaotic restart after the second crimson flag, which noticed a string of incidents generate a 3rd crimson flag.

The penalty was awarded earlier than the resumption for the one lap run to the chequered flag behind the security automobile.

An emotional Sainz made it clear on crew radio that he felt he should have been given a chance to explain the incident to the stewards.

In distinction, the collision between Pierre Gasly and Esteban Ocon that occurred simply seconds after the Sainz and Alonso conflict was investigated after the race, resulting in no further action.

As well as, a crash between Logan Sargeant and Nyck de Vries that noticed each drivers find yourself within the gravel was not topic to a proper investigation.

- Advertisement -

For the resumption the vehicles had been put again within the earlier grid order, minus any lacking vehicles, with Sainz in fourth place.

He subsequently crossed the road nonetheless fourth on the street, however with the entire subject stacked up behind him he dropped to twelfth within the last classification because the penalty clicked in.

If the penalty is finally rescinded Sainz would doubtlessly get his fourth place again and the drivers behind him – Lance Stroll, Sergio Perez, Lando Norris, Nico Hulkenberg, Oscar Piastri, Zhou Guanyu and Yuki Tsunoda – would all drop again a spot and lose factors.

“As we’re discussing with the FIA, and we despatched the report back to the FIA, I do not need to disclose any particulars of this dialogue,” stated crew boss Fred Vasseur.

“The one factor is that about Gasly/Ocon, and for certain we had Sargeant/De Vries at Flip 1, and the response of the stewards was not the identical. However I need to keep away from making any remark.”

Frederic Vasseur, Group Principal and Common Supervisor, Scuderia Ferrari

Photograph by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

The evaluate course of, final utilized in F1 when Aston Martin made a direct problem to Alonso’s penalty on Sunday evening in Jeddah, entails two steps.

Firstly, the stewards should resolve whether or not there’s a case to be answered and particularly if there’s a “important and related new aspect” and in the event that they resolve to proceed they then decide based mostly on that new proof.

“The method is that first they may take a look on our petition to see if they will re-open the case,” stated Vasseur. “Then we’ll have a second listening to a bit later, with the identical stewards or the stewards of the following assembly, in regards to the resolution itself.

“What we are able to anticipate is a minimum of to have an open dialogue with them, and in addition for the great of the game to keep away from this sort of resolution when you’ve gotten three {cases} on the identical nook, and never the identical resolution.

“The largest frustration was from Carlos, and also you heard it on the radio, to not have a listening to.

“As a result of the case was very particular, and on this case, I feel it might have made sense contemplating that it was the race was over, it was not affecting the rostrum, to have a listening to, as Gasly and Ocon had.”

Ferrari’s new proof could revolve round automobile knowledge that was not instantly obtainable to the stewards on the time, though Vasseur declined to disclose any particulars.

“It is as much as the stewards to what’s the proper penalty, however for me a minimum of for Carlos, for the crew, to reopen the dialogue, it’s a primary step. The result of this might be as much as the FIA. We’ve our argument for certain, however I’ll hold the argument for the FIA.

“For certain we predict the evaluate of the choice, as a result of it is a petition for evaluate, and we’re not going to get the identical resolution.”

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR23, Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-23, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR23

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR23, Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-23, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR23

Photograph by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images

Vasseur acknowledged that it’s not all the time simple for officers to make a name on collisions, particularly within the warmth of the second.

“I do not need to blame somebody,” he stated. “On the racing incidents, and I am doing this job for 33 years now, every time that we had a crash on observe I feel you’ve gotten two variations, all the time, with a distinct suggestions and a distinct final result, relying on the drivers.

“It signifies that it isn’t a straightforward job. And in addition that it is troublesome to take a call when it is in the course of the race. We’re all the time asking to take selections in the course of the race.

“This case was most likely a bit specific with the three crimson flags, with the 2 begins, and the final begin with one lap behind the security automobile.

“It is the place the frustration got here from, as a result of we had the sensation that the Ocon/Gasly state of affairs was handled a bit in another way.”

Learn Additionally:

Relating to the timing of any FIA listening to, he stated: “They’ve the lead on the state of affairs now. It is as much as them to resolve the primary listening to about the truth that they will obtain or not the request.

“It is as much as them to resolve once they need to do it. It might be in Baku, or it might be earlier than. We choose to do it earlier than, and be targeted on one thing else in Baku.

“They should do it in a brief interval. It is true that for as soon as that now we have 4 weeks between the 2 races, and it’s kind of extra versatile. With Kimi [Raikkonen] two years in the past at Alfa Romeo we did the hearings on the subsequent race.”

Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article