5.7 C
London
Wednesday, December 1, 2021

FIA plans F1 driver talks over “marginal” Raikkonen name

Must read

- Advertisement -


Alonso was left annoyed at the Austin race over the way that he felt Raikkonen had gained a position on him regardless of having overtaken him when working huge throughout the kerbs on the exit of Flip 1.

After Raikkonen handed the Alpine driver, Alonso known as on the Finn at hand the place again – however race management determined that no motion wanted be taken and let Raikkonen preserve the place.

A number of laps later, Alonso went off observe whereas passing Raikkonen’s Alfa Romeo teammate Antonio Giovinazzi, and this time the Alpine driver was advised at hand the place again.

Later in the identical fraught battle Giovinazzi was advised at hand the place again after going off the street whereas passing Alonso.

After the race Alonso questioned the “unusual” choice to let Raikkonen keep forward whereas the opposite strikes he was concerned in needed to be reversed.

- Advertisement -

Talking concerning the incident, Masi defined that the circumstances of the incident weren’t clear reduce and reckoned it was one thing that wanted mentioning with drivers on the Mexican Grand Prix.

“I can perceive his frustration,” stated Masi. “The decision with reference to him and Kimi at Flip 1 was definitely marginal.

“We definitely could have a dialogue on the subsequent drivers’ assembly with all the drivers about it, as a result of I believe there was two components to the story, let’s name it.

“There may be being clearly the overtake and searching on the forcing off the observe, after which clearly the next component of the overtake. So it’s one thing we’ll focus on on the subsequent assembly.”

Masi famous that Raikkonen escaped as a result of it may very well be argued that Alonso had pushed him huge within the first place.

“You hit the nail on the top, that is why it was a marginal name. There have been clearly the 2 components of it that have been checked out, and it was decided on that foundation that marginally it made the choice: ‘let’s simply go away it as it’s’. However definitely it’ll little question be mentioned on the subsequent drivers’ assembly.”

Antonio Giovinazzi, Alfa Romeo Racing C41, Fernando Alonso, Alpine A521, and Kimi Raikkonen, Alfa Romeo Racing C41

Picture by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Masi harassed that regardless of Alonso’s suggestion {that a} fast name needed to be made on the incident it was obligatory to check it correctly.

“The necessary half is that it’s good to truly have a look at it, to truly have a look at all the things round it. And my name to the groups is a suggestion.

“They will select to not comply with it, and in the event that they select to not, I haven’t got the ability to say it’s a must to do that. It is ‘I counsel that you just do that’. And in the event that they select to not, I refer that to the stewards for them to view, and so they’ll make their judgement accordingly.”

Requested if he thought Alonso was attempting to show some extent together with his subsequent transfer on Giovinazzi Masi stated: “No, in no way. I did not hear Fernando’s radio in any respect, however clearly he went off and my suggestion went to the workforce that they provide the place again, which occurred.

Learn Additionally:

“After which the identical factor occurred a few laps later with Antonio and Fernando, and the instruction went to Alfa Romeo for that place to be given again.”

Masi acknowledged that Alonso’s title has featured a number of instances of late within the context of FIA choices.

“I believe it’s humorous how the incidents come up, however I deal with every incident and take a look at every one no matter who’s concerned in it.”



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article