The McLaren driver was handed a five-second time penalty at the Red Bull Ring in July after the FIA felt that he had pressured Sergio Perez off the observe as they battled for place at Flip 4 within the race.
The situation of that incident, with Perez attacking across the exterior on the entry and attempting to carry his line, has repeatedly been claimed for instance of why there appears to be inconsistency within the FIA’s ruling on what occurred between Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton final weekend.
Whereas Norris was discovered responsible of an offence, Verstappen was given the all clear regardless of having run off the observe himself after crowding Hamilton out on the entry.
F1 drivers have tried to seek clarity on the racing rules over this weekend’s Qatar Grand Prix, however race director Michael Masi has made clear to them that the stance stays that every one incidents can be handled on their very own particular person deserves.
Norris says that his grasp of the FIA’s strategy makes him positive that he did nothing improper in Austria – with the one distinction in circumstance being that Perez ran large into gravel whereas Hamilton was pressured on to an asphalt run-off.
Requested by Autosport if he understood why his Austrian incident and Verstappen’s Brazil defence had been handled in a different way, Norris was not fully clear.
“Type of,” he stated. “A number of the issues that we now perceive signifies that I should not have gotten a penalty. However then additionally, what forms of surfaces are on the skin of the circuit, whether or not that is gravel or tarmac or no matter, may also have an impact. Which I do not suppose is perhaps honest.
“I believe if you already know there’s gravel on the skin, and you already know in the event you’re not fully alongside, which Perez wasn’t, then he is put himself in that very dangerous place.”
Lando Norris, McLaren MCL35M, Sergio Perez, Pink Bull Racing RB16B
Picture by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images
The FIA has lengthy insisted that the results of incidents aren’t taken under consideration when coming to verdicts – so in concept the presence of a gravel entice or asphalt shouldn’t be the final word deciding issue.
Nonetheless, Norris thinks that it’s clearly a component that’s checked out, particularly contemplating Perez was a lot additional again towards him than Hamilton was towards Verstappen.
“That is the one factor that I consider now will need to have been the distinction: he wasn’t alongside me, like all the best way alongside me. It was like half a automobile.
“I gave a little bit of house for him to again out, and it wasn’t like I shoved him off. There was no contact made, so from that perspective there isn’t any cause I ought to have gotten the penalty.
“The one cause I now consider is that there was gravel and never tarmac. And I really feel like that is a little bit of a tough one to provide a penalty on, in that there was gravel and never tarmac.
“That is not my fault: it is the man on the skin’s danger. He is put himself on the skin on the nook and it is as much as him. I nonetheless really feel prefer it’s an unfair penalty I received.”