Final month’s moist race at Spa-Francorchamps needed to be deserted after three laps behind a security automotive as a result of situations weren’t adequate to permit the present technology of automobiles to race.
The excessive ranges of downforce produced by the most recent grand prix equipment, plus wider tyres, means extra spray is thrown into the air in moist working, and that makes visibility too dangerous.
Todt thinks the matter must be addressed sooner or later, and reckons than when the following main guidelines overhaul is deliberate – almost definitely to coincide with all-new energy items from 2025 – that moist climate working must be factored in.
“There have been many who criticised what was determined at Spa [by not racing], however what would have occurred if, after the beginning, we had had an accident with 10 automobiles that resulted in injured drivers or worse,” defined Todt.
“We might have been massacred. And even with out accidents we’d have been criticised. For the 2025 rules, we should take into consideration having automobiles that may be pushed even within the rain.
“Do you bear in mind [Niki] Lauda at Fuji in ’76? He was the one one of many drivers to surrender racing within the rain. At the moment, each driver thinks as Lauda did then.”
F1’s failure to go forward with the Belgian Grand Prix brought on some controversy, particularly with the way in which that half factors have been handed out regardless of the actual fact no precise laps at racing velocity have been accomplished.
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W12, Daniel Ricciardo, McLaren MCL35M, within the pit lane
Photograph by: Steve Etherington / Motorsport Images
DTM boss Gerhard Berger believed that F1 had to select about both by no means racing within the rain or pushing on when situations weren’t very best. He mentioned the present midway home was not good for anybody.
“I’ve no sympathy for this to be trustworthy,” he mentioned in regards to the fallout from Spa.
“My opinion is: you need to resolve beforehand if you wish to have races within the rain or not. In America [on ovals] they’ve determined to don’t have any moist races, which is ok and everyone is aware of it.
“However Method 1 used to have them and we race within the rain as properly in DTM. Motorsport is harmful and sure, it’s troublesome when it comes to visibility, however if you happen to resolve in favour of rain races then that is what you need to cope with.
“When it’s slippery or when you could have a number of water, you simply have to cut back your velocity. That’s a part of our sport.
“Perhaps in the long run it was very dangerous at Spa, however to start with I did not see any cause why there should not be a moist race happening.
“Begins behind the security automotive are the identical factor for me. I do not agree. You need to have standing begins, additionally within the rain. For me, that’s much less harmful as you strategy the primary nook with much less velocity. With a flying begin you could have extra water and fewer visibility.
“Simply do two laps behind the security automotive after which have a standing begin.”
Further reporting by Franco Nugnes and Ronald Vording.