The transfer comes within the wake of Texas‘ new abortion legislation, which bans all abortions after six weeks of being pregnant and permits personal residents to sue individuals who assist a pregnant particular person violate the ban. The Texas legislation took impact Sept. 1 and was upheld in a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Courtroom.
California and Texas, the nation’s two most populous states, routinely take separate sides on points like well being care and immigration, with Democrat-led California usually taking liberal stands and Republican-led Texas treading a conservative path.
One new California legislation prohibits the recording or photographing sufferers or suppliers inside 100 ft of a clinic that gives abortions, whereas the opposite requires a affected person’s heath data to be saved confidential – even when that affected person will not be the first policyholder on their medical insurance.
“California has been a pacesetter in defending entry to sexual and reproductive rights, however as we’ve seen just lately with unprecedented assaults on these rights, we are able to and should do extra,” Newsom, a Democrat, mentioned in a statement from his office. “I’m proud at present to signal these two payments that show our dedication to strengthening and additional defending entry to reproductive well being care companies in California.”
“Essentially the most treasured freedom is life itself. Texas handed a legislation that ensures that the life of each youngster with a heartbeat will probably be spared from the ravages of abortion,” Abbott’s press secretary Renae Eze mentioned in a press release to Fox Information.
Critics say many ladies don’t but know they’re pregnant at six weeks – across the time when a fetal heartbeat can first be detected – and the legislation makes no exceptions for rape or incest.
“These are darkish days. I do not suppose one can understate the consequential nature of the second that we live in,” Newsom mentioned. “It turns into of outsized significance that California assert itself.”
Newsom earlier this month survived an effort to have him faraway from workplace, sparked largely by the state’s coronavirus restrictions on companies, faculties and locations of worship. In the course of the recall marketing campaign, the previous San Francisco mayor alluded to the Texas abortion legislation as he made appeals to voters.
In California, the primary new legislation, authored by state Assemblywoman Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, a Democrat from Orinda, makes it a misdemeanor to movie somebody with out their consent for the aim of intimidation. Those that violate the legislation could be punished by as much as one 12 months in county jail, a superb of as much as $10,000, or each.
It is already unlawful in California to publish private details about abortion suppliers or their sufferers on-line, however that legislation had not been up to date for the reason that mid-2000s previous to Wednesday. The legislation additionally updates peace officer coaching associated to anti-reproduction-rights offenses.
“We’re upping the ante. We’re saying in California we is not going to settle for that our reproductive well being care suppliers and sufferers be topic to threats each on-line and in particular person,” Bauer-Kahan mentioned.
The opposite new legislation, authored by state Assemblyman David Chiu, a Democrat from San Francisco, requires insurance coverage corporations in California to robotically hold sure medical procedures confidential — together with abortions. Chiu burdened the invoice’s significance as a result of the federal Reasonably priced Care Act permits individuals to remain on their mother or father’s medical insurance plans till age 26.
“This violation of privateness has put them in a horrible and, in some cases, a good harmful place,” Chiu mentioned. “In the event you’re receiving delicate well being companies, solely it is best to get confidential communications about it.”
Jonathan Keller, president of the California Household Council, mentioned the invoice ought to have distinguished between a 25-year-old on their mother or father’s well being plan and a 12-year-old.
“Dad and mom must be consulted earlier than their minor youngsters are given life-altering medical remedy,” Keller mentioned. “It is deeply regarding that the Legislature and the governor proceed to usurp parental authority.”
The Related Press contributed to this report.