17.2 C
London
Friday, July 12, 2024

Great Britain. Report: Boris Johnson may have misled parliament over ‘partygate’

Must read

- Advertisement -


A House of Commons committee in its report into Downing Street events during the Covid-19 lockdown states that “the breaches of guidelines were obvious to Johnson at the time he attended these gatherings”.

It seems that Boris Johnson as prime minister, he misled parliament four times by giving explanations about events that took place in Downing Street during the covid restrictions, a committee of the British House of Commons wrote in a preliminary report published on Friday.

“The evidence strongly suggests that the breaches of the guidelines were obvious to Mr Johnson at the time he attended these assemblies. There is evidence that those who advised Mr Johnson what to say to the press and in the House (Commons) themselves had trouble arguing that that some assemblies were in accordance with the rules,” said the Privileges Committee, which is investigating whether Johnson misled Parliament by providing explanations on the matter, wrote in a 24-page report.

Asked in December 2021 about media reports about Downing Street drinking parties, Johnson told the House of Commons four times that no rules had been broken. However, two other investigations – an internal one led by civil servant Sue Gray and a police investigation – came to different conclusions, and Johnson was one of many people in the crowd to be fined.

- Advertisement -

Boris JohnsonTOLGA AKMEN/PAP/EPA

Knowingly misleading Parliament is a very serious offense in the UK and a member of the government found guilty of this is expected to resign.

Although Johnson already left the post of prime minister in September last year, if the committee’s final report concludes that he has knowingly misled Parliament, he may be suspended for 10 days, which in turn is grounds for filing a lawsuit. petition in his constituency to dismiss him as MP.

The commission said it had called on Johnson to explain in the week beginning March 20 why he told MPs that no guidelines had been broken, “since he knew what the guidelines were and was present at meetings where the guidelines were broken” and “why not informed the Houses of the meetings at which he was present.

Johnson: Those were my sincere beliefs

Referring to Friday’s report, Johnson said there was no “evidence” that he knowingly or inadvertently misled Parliament, or that he was aware of a breach of the rules.

“When I told the House that the rules and guidelines were followed, that was my sincere belief,” he said. He also noted that the committee made 26 references in its report to Sue Gray’s “selective and orchestrated” investigation.

On Thursday, it was reported that Gray had left the civil service to take over as chief of staff to opposition leader Keir Starmer, which Johnson’s supporters point to as proof that her investigation was not impartial.

Main photo source: TOLGA AKMEN/PAP/EPA



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article