15.3 C
London
Monday, May 27, 2024

Iran attack on Israel. Dr. Witold Repetowicz: the attack was at Netanyahu's advantage, but Iran could not not carry it out

Must read

- Advertisement -


Iran's reaction to the bombing of the consulate in Damascus was a spectacular response, but a weak one, and Iran did not want it to be stronger – said Dr. Witold Repetowicz in “You get up and know”. The expert also assessed that Iran could not have not carried out this attack.

On the night from Saturday to Sunday, Iran fired approximately 300 drones and missiles towards Israel, 99 percent of which were intercepted. Israeli President Isaac Herzog said the attack was a “declaration of war.” The Iranian armed forces, however, described this action as retaliation for the bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus, which killed several Iranian officers.

Dr. Witold Repetowicz from the Foundation. Casimir Pulaski and the Academy of War Arts said that if Israel's response to the Iranian attack is “too radical, Iran will definitely respond.”

Read also: What do we know about Iran's attack on Israel? The most important information

- Advertisement -

What determined the effective defense of Israel?Jacek Tacik/Fakty TVN

– The whole world – countries in the region and the United States and other US allies want de-escalation and have refused to support Israel for any kinetic actions against Iran. This significantly determines Israel's ability to carry out such actions on Iranian territory. Fortunately, because I believe that Israel would like to strike on Iranian territory and conduct a kinetic operation on Iranian territory, he said. He explained that the kinetic operation is to shell, bomb and destroy the territory of Iran.

He also pointed out that “from Netanyahu's perspective, the confrontation with Iran is distracting the world's attention from the Gaza Strip.” – Just the day before yesterday, there was very sharp criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel's actions in Gaza from Democratic senators in the US and pressure on Biden not to support Israel unconditionally in the face of the planned offensive in Rafah. In the confrontation with Iran, this changes, he said.

– Yesterday's attack benefited Netanyahu. However, Iran could not not carry it out because it would completely lose face – noted Dr. Repetowicz.

The sky over the Israeli city of Ashkelon during the Iranian attack Amir Cohen / Reuters / Forum

Iran attacked IsraelEPA/ATEF SAFADI

“Iran didn't want the response to be stronger.”

He also assessed that Iran's response was a “weak response.” – It was a spectacular response, but a weak one, and Iran did not want it to be stronger. Iran did not want her to force the United States to act against Iran. Therefore, Iran did not use the element of surprise, but on the contrary, it warned (before the attack) – said Dr. Repetowicz.

– Iran wanted to show its capabilities to Israel. Iran could have done it in such a way that there would be significant damage to Israel, but it knew that it could lead to war – said an expert from the Academy of War Arts.

See more: The US president after talking to Netanyahu. “We helped shoot down almost all the drones and missiles”

Anticipating the attack also allowed the United States to prepare for air defense. According to the expert, Iron Dome was only effective with allied support. – Arab countries were not afraid to shoot down (missiles – ed.) because they knew that, paradoxically, Iran wanted this and it would not put them on a collision course with Iran.

According to Repetowicz, in the event of an escalation of the Israeli-Iranian conflict, “the countries of the region will remain neutral.” – They have no reason to support Israel, nor do they have any reason to support actions against Israel. However, they have reason to be afraid of Iran's response, so they will not want to prepare for a strike, but will wait to see what happens, he said.

Main photo source: TVN24



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article