5.4 C
London
Sunday, October 13, 2024

Judge Włodzimierz Wróbel on the Prime Minister's countersignature. “We live in a state of schizophrenia”

Must read

- Advertisement -


Let's break away from this countersignature. Whether it was granted or withdrawn, one thing is certain: what the president wanted to do in the Supreme Court, that is, appoint some commissioner of his to conduct the election of the president, was ineffective – said Professor Włodzimierz Wróbel, a judge of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, in “Fakty po Faktach”.

Professor at the Department of Criminal Law of the Jagiellonian University, judge of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, Włodzimierz Wróbel, spoke in “Fakty po Faktach” on TVN24 about the Prime Minister's countersignature Donald Tuskwhich – the head of government claims – he repealed. This concerns the signature under the president's resolution to appoint a neo-judge as the chairman of the assembly of judges of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court, so that it could propose new presidents of the Chamber. In the legal community, various opinions have appeared regarding the prime minister's actions.

As Wróbel noted, “some claimed that this countersignature is simply an administrative decision”. – Constitutionalists, who are accustomed to treating all of this in constitutional categories, saw it as a political decision from which there is no turning back – he pointed out.

According to him, “we still live in some kind of schizophrenic state.” – It's really hard to figure it out. Untangling these knots with normal methods, the ones that even lawyers usually learn in college, is incredibly, incredibly difficult – he emphasized.

- Advertisement -

– I would say: let's break away from this countersignature and (its) withdrawal, not revocation. Whether it was granted or withdrawn, one thing is certain – what the president wanted to do in the Supreme Court, that is, appoint some commissioner of his to conduct the elections of the president, was ineffective. It could not have any effects, because it was unconstitutional – he assessed.

The sparrow said that “Today this election meeting took placethis commissioner did it”. – But we are sure of one thing, and for that we can also be grateful to the executive power that it has declared that it will not recognize this type of action – he added.

Main image source: TVN24



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article