10.5 C
London
Thursday, February 29, 2024

Justice Defense Committee: Judge Igor Tyleya has no reason to appear in the prosecutor’s office

Must read

- Advertisement -


The members of the Justice Defense Committee referred to the words of the chairman of the neo-KRS bis Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka, who in the “One for One” program was asked about the case of judge Igor Tuleya and judge Paweł Juszczyszyn. According to members of the Committee, the former “has no reason to report to the prosecutor’s office” and the latter “is a victim of harassment”.

The Justice Defense Committee (its members include prof. Ewa Łętowska and prof. Mirosław Wyrzykowski) referred on Friday to the words of the chairman of the neo-KRS bis Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka, which were fired in the TVN24 program “One for One”.

In the online play-off, the president was asked about the case of suspended judges Igor Tuleya and Paweł Juszczyszyn.

The Justice Defense Committee organized a conference in connection with the adoption by the Sejm of the draft act dissolving the Disciplinary ChamberTVN24

Judge Tuleyi’s case dates back to 2017

- Advertisement -

Let us recall that the suspension of Igor Tuleya was related to the proceedings regarding the debates of the Sejm in 2017, which were moved from the meeting room to the column room and voting took place there. There was a notification to the prosecutor’s office regarding the legality of the deliberations in the column room. The prosecutor’s office discontinued the investigation twice.

The judge examined the second appeal against the discontinuation of the proceedings Igor Tuleyawho overturned the prosecutor’s decision and agreed that journalists should be present in the courtroom when the sentence was pronounced.

It was declared illegal by the head of the district court in Warsaw, disciplinary commissioners, and later by the Disciplinary Chamber The Supreme Court. Among the transcripts there were testimonies of deputies Law and Justiceincluding the Deputy Speaker of the Sejm Ryszard Terlecki.

After the prosecutor’s office’s decision to discontinue the investigation was revoked, there was a request to punish him with the Disciplinary Chamber and waive his immunity.

The Disciplinary Chamber lifted the judge’s immunity, which allowed the prosecution to start proceedings against him. He was summoned to the prosecutor’s office, but did not appear on multiple summons, as he believes that the Disciplinary Chamber is not – within the meaning of the law – a court and the decision to lift immunity has no legal basis.

Pawełczyk-Woicka on “continuous disciplinary tort”

Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woicka stated on TVN24 that Judge Tuleya “commits a continuous disciplinary tort” because he “does not appear before the Polish prosecutor’s office to submit explanations”.

Pawełczyk-Woicka: Judge Tuleya commits a continuous disciplinary tortTVN24

– He is in some way above the law. I suppose that if the judge appeared (to the prosecutor’s office) and gave explanations, it is possible that this case would end very quickly at this stage – she said.

KOS: Judge Tuleya enjoys immunity

The members of the Justice Defense Committee, referring to these words, said Judge Tuleya had no reason to appear in the prosecution service. Because – as they argued – he still enjoys a judge’s immunity, which has not been taken away from him, “because the authority that tried to do so is not a court”.

The Disciplinary Chamber restored Judge Juszczyszyn

During the conversation in the program “One for One”, chairman Pawełczyk-Woicka also referred to the case of Paweł Juszczyszyn, judge from Olsztyn. He, in turn, was suspended in February 2020, after considering an appeal in a civil case in November 2019, he deemed it necessary to decide whether a judge nominated by the newly established National Council of the Judiciary was entitled to adjudicate in the first instance.

Therefore, in the issued decision, he ordered the Chancellery of the Sejm to present lists of support for candidates for the National Council of the Judiciary. The decision to suspend the judge was made by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court. At the end of May 2022, however, the same chamber revoked the decision to suspend the judge.

Speaker of the Chamber that the proceedings took too long

Dagmara Pawełczyk-Woickiej, explaining this decision, stated that “as far as judge Juszczyszyn is concerned, we have taken certain actions related to the attempted vetting in the Supreme Court, because it was disturbing that the judge had been suspended for several years and the case was not settled and has been such a suspension “

“It is unacceptable,” she pointed out.

Pawełczyk-Woicka: In the case of Judge Juszczyszyn, we have attempted a lustration in the Supreme Court

Pawełczyk-Woicka: In the case of Judge Juszczyszyn, we have attempted a lustration in the Supreme CourtTVN24

She added that the first president of the Supreme Court, Małgorzata Manowska, “refused access to documents” in this case.

– So we looked for these documents through interviews with judges, through analysis in the disciplinary officer office. The information that I managed to gather showed that the explanatory and disciplinary proceedings at the stage of the disciplinary officer as to the person of judge Juszczyszyn lasted a year, which was definitely too long. After a year, the application for recognition of this case was submitted to the Supreme Court and was not registered for a year – she described.

When asked if it was then a form of sabotage, Pawełczyk-Woicka replied that “such were the organizational decisions”.

Attorney Wawrykiewicz: a situation straight from autocratic countries

– As for judge Juszczyszyn, I understand from this statement on the neo-KRS that both the neo-KRS and their acolytes from the Disciplinary Chamber decided to show mercy towards the judge, because he had been suspended for too long and he could not adjudicate – commented at the conference of the Justice Defense Committee Juszczyszyn’s representative, attorney Michał Wawrykiewicz. – This is obviously a situation straight from autocratic states, and not from a democratic state governed by a legal order

He added that according to the Polish Constitution, only an independent and impartial court may take any action against a judge, “and not the Disciplinary Chamber, which is not that court”.

– Both the actions taken on February 4, 2020, when the judge was removed from adjudication, and the restoration thereof, are actions that have no legal value. They only have a factual value – that he was forcibly removed from the ruling and can now return – he stated.

Juszczyszyn “victim of harassment”

He also referred to the fact that the president of the court in which Juszczyszyn had adjudicated decided that he would be transferred to another department and that he would have to use the outstanding leave before returning to the courtroom.

– After all, it was not driven by staffing needs, but harassment on the part of the president of the court. And an immediate forced shift to vacation – he said.

The Justice Defense Committee organized a press conference on Friday in connection with the adoption by the Sejm of the draft law liquidating the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court. This is to open the way for acceptance Of the National Reconstruction Plan for Poland by the European Commission. According to the members of the Committee, the money will not be unblocked, because the project does not meet the conditions (the so-called milestones) set for Poland by the European Commission.

Main photo source: TVN24



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article