Member of the Civic Coalition Michał Szczerba published on his Twitter profile a motion for the reassumption of Wednesday’s vote on the adjournment of the meeting. The deputies at this meeting, after the reassumption, passed the anti-TVN bill. In his opinion, it could not constitute a basis for another vote.
On Wednesday after 5 p.m., a voting block began in the Sejm, the plan of which included voting on the anti-TVN bill. Unexpectedly, the deputies, at the request of the opposition, voted to postpone the meeting until September. Immediately after the vote, Sejm Marshal Elżbieta Witek from Law and Justice ordered a break.
A lost vote, then a reassumption
When the deputies returned to the meeting room, Witek announced that she had received it request for reassumption of the vote on the adjournment of the sitting of the Sejm. This conclusion, she said, refers to the fact that “no date was given”. “I consulted five lawyers who confirmed that this motion could be voted on at this hearing,” she said. In another vote, the Sejm rejected the motion to adjourn the session. That day was put to the vote lex TVNwhich was passed with 228 votes.
The act known as anti-TVN changes the rules of granting broadcasting licenses to media with capital from outside the European Economic Area. In the opinion of commentators, the PiS project targets the independence of TVN. Many journalists, politicians and institutions protested against the changes in the media law.
One statement of reasons in the application
KO MP Michał Szczerba (voted against lex TVN) published a document on Twitter on Thursday, which in his opinion is a motion for the reassumption of Wednesday’s vote to adjourn the meeting, which was to be won together with KO MP Dariusz Joński (he also voted against Lex TVN).
In the application published by Szczerba, apart from a number of signatures, there was one sentence of justification. “Due to the imprecise ordering of voting for postponement without specifying the date of the postponement, we are asking for a reassumption of this vote” – it was written.
“One sentence of the justification. The result did not raise any doubts. This conclusion could not be a basis for a reassumption” – commented Szczerba. “Extra-statutory lawlessness!” – added.
Main photo source: Wojciech Olkuśnik / PAP