Presidential advisor Łukasz Rzepecki claims that the act of clemency applied by Andrzej Duda towards Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik in 2015 “is still in force today.” However, it was issued before the final judgment, which was passed only in December 2023. Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus from the Left pointed out that recently, on the website of the head of state, it was possible to read that the president “has the option of remitting a sentence that has been legally imposed.”
PiS politicians Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik were sentenced to prison by a final judgment at the end of December. Both do not recognize this verdict and claim they are innocent. They refer to the president’s pardon, which was applied in 2015, after the non-final verdict. According to the announcement, the president will not apply this law a second time.
Rzepecki: the 2015 pardon is still valid today
The guests of “Kawa na Ława” on TVN24 discussed the situation of Kamiński and Wąsik on Sunday. The president’s advisor, Łukasz Rzepecki, emphasized that in 2015 Andrzej Duda “he applied the effective law of grace, which is still in force today.”
– There is no need for the president to again apply something that he has used effectively. This was confirmed by three judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, he added.
Scheuring-Wielgus: you are getting lost
Left MP Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus responded to Rzepecki’s words. – Back in June, on the president’s website, on your website, there was information that under Article 139 of the constitution, the president applies the power of pardon and has the option of remitting a sentence that has been legally imposed.
– In June, after the interview with Mr. Konrad Piasecki, you deleted it and put something else. You are getting lost yourself – added the MP.
Kobosko: if they try to force it, it will be disastrous
Despite the fact that their mandates have expired and the appeal was heard by an unrecognized chamber of the Supreme Court, Kamiński and Wąsik want to take part in the next session of the Sejm scheduled for January 10.
As Michał Kobosko from Poland 2050 said, “the current state of affairs is that both gentlemen’s ID cards are invalid and non-functional.”
– From my view of the situation, both gentlemen should not take part in votes and should not sit in the plenary hall. They are not MPs, their mandates have expired. If they try to force their way into the room, and I am afraid of such a course of events, it would be disastrous for Poland and for our sense that we have a country that functions efficiently – added the Polish 2050 MP.
Arłukowicz: they are criminals, they cannot enter the hall
Bartosz Arłukowicz from the Civic Coalition also said that “Wąsik and Kamiński, according to the court’s ruling, are criminals” and “therefore they cannot enter the room.” – This is obvious – he said.
– In order to maintain purity and rules in political life, guests who have been sentenced by a final judgment cannot cross the threshold of the hall – emphasized the KO MP.
Horała: they are not convicted
Marcin Horała z PIS has a different opinion. He said that Kamiński and Wąsik “of course should enter and participate (in the meeting), they are MPs.”
– Their mandates were deprived on the basis that they had allegedly been convicted by a final judgment. Meanwhile, the presidential power of clemency has been applied and they are not convicted. Moreover, the MPs took advantage of the opportunity to appeal against the decision to terminate their mandate. The case went to the Supreme Court. (…) The court declared this decision invalid, so they are still MPs, he said.
Wipler: the matter is clear and transparent
Przemysław Wipler from Konfederacja said that “it is clear to him that both gentlemen have exceeded their powers and committed very serious official crimes.” – We suspect that there were more crimes, which is why investigative commissions are being established – he noted.
– If there was such a logic that you could pardon someone who has not been convicted by a final judgment, why not before the first instance? And why create investigative commissions at all, if the president could pardon everyone for everything before the indictments even reach the court? This contradicts fundamental logic and the sense of human justice, he emphasized.