20.8 C
London
Sunday, May 19, 2024

Poll. Should NBP President Adam Glapiński appear before the State Tribunal?

Must read

- Advertisement -


Nearly half of the surveyed Poles – 47 percent – believe that Adam Glapiński, president of the National Bank of Poland, should appear before the State Tribunal. 39 percent of respondents have the opposite opinion.

In a survey by the Opinia24 center for “Fakty” TVN and TVN24, respondents were asked the question: “In your opinion, should the President of the NBP, Adam Glapiński, appear before the State Tribunal?”

Almost half of the respondents – 47 percent – believed that Glapiński should appear before the State Tribunal, of which 23 percent of respondents chose the option “definitely yes” and 24 percent “rather yes”.

39 percent of respondents had the opposite opinion, of which 21 percent of respondents said “definitely not” and 18 percent “rather not”.

- Advertisement -

14 percent of respondents chose the “don't know/difficult to say” option.

The study was conducted by Opinia24 using CATI telephone interviews, on a representative sample of 1,001 Polish residents aged 18 and over, completion date: April 2-3, 2024.

Eight charges

At the end of March, a group of MPs from the ruling coalition submitted a motion to the Sejm to bring the president of the National Bank of Poland, Adam Glapiński, before the State Tribunal. The motion was signed by 191 MPs.

During a joint press conference of the group of applicants' MPs, Left MP Tomasz Trela ​​said that, contrary to what PiS politicians said, “the application is very specific, the allegations are very specific, and the justification is over 70 pages.” – This is not politics, these are facts – Adam Glapiński was the worst president of the NBP after 1989 – he said.

In the preliminary motion to bring Glapiński before the Court of Justice, he is accused of violating the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and laws in connection with the position he holds or within the scope of his office.

READ MORE: The President of the National Bank of Poland and the Committee for Constitutional Responsibility. When can he call?

Eight charges are listed, including: indirect financing of the budget deficit through the purchase of State Treasury bonds and bonds guaranteed by the State Treasury, intervention in the currency market without proper authorization from the NBP management board, lowering interest rates before the parliamentary elections, politicizing the central bank or introducing quarterly rewards for itself.

“This motion is limited to bringing charges solely against Adam Glapiński, as the President of the NBP, even though some of the acts accused of him were committed jointly and in consultation with some members of the Management Board and some members of the Monetary Policy Council, although in most cases on the initiative of Adam Glapiński,” they wrote applicants. They added that the law does not provide for the possibility of bringing members of the management board of the central bank or the Monetary Policy Council other than the President of NBP to constitutional liability.

Main photo source: Paweł Supernak/PAP



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article