In the debate organized by TV Republic Cailed: Krzysztof Stanowski, Marek Jakubiak, Joanna Senyszyn, Karol Nawrocki, Grzegorz Braun, Adrian Zandberg, Artur Bartoszewicz, Sławomir Mentzen, Marek Woch and Szymon Hołownia. For some viewers, the fact that they did not take part in the event Rafał Trzaskowski and Magdalena Biejat. Hurdle He asked for an expert assessment of body speech present at the debate of candidates and candidates Anna Kulma – public speaking trainer and the Polish academic champion of Oxford debates.
Presidential debate on TV Republika. This is how individual candidates went
– Nawrocki's first statement showed good preparation for the thread of pensions. Both this and the next statement began with the tingling towards Trzaskowski. Nawrocki also liked telling whose president he wants to be: “I want to be the president of patients” and “I want to be the voice of Poles who lost their faith in the rule of law.” A slightly visible sign of stress was “flexible” behind the rostrum – quite a lot of uncontrolled microchs – the specialist explained to us.
Sławomir Mentzen does not promise to win this debate. – complaining about the lack of a clock, holy forehead, browsing the phone during the debate – these behaviors suggest Mentzen's nervousness. It is true that he hides her under the influence of information – his statements are filled with data, whose sources we do not know, so it is difficult to assess their credibility. We know Mentzen from speaking in a fairly mechanical way, quickly, on a compressed jaw – The naturalness of his statements suffers from this – the expert assessed.
The expert also looked at Joanna Senyszyn's speeches, who has gained many voters in the eyes of the last week. – Senyszyn has recently been gaining sympathy for the young generation – Her statements are seen as direct, easy to understand and funny. Again, let's notice how important for Senyszyn it is to use notes and how difficult it is to fit in time – the candidate does not have such a reflex as the others. Almost the entire debate is based on a podium with your hands close to the face – shows that he feels comfortable, although it does not look very good in the camera. After about 45 seconds, its performance deteriorates – she is visibly harder to say – said Anna Kulma.
As the marshal managed it Szymon Ho³ownia? – Hołownia, as usual, vividly. He talks about “salesmen”, “partisans”, “children”. It performs many wide gestures to encourage cooperation. It manages sometimes. The marshal showed competence in response to the activities of the Trump administration: “I listen to you with admiration.” But this is not enough to voters – We are waiting for Hołownia for something that goes beyond the form of the media candidate – the expert evaluated clearly.
The expert also drew attention to the grinding between Karol Nawrocki and Szymon Hołownia
The trainer of public speaking also drew attention to the first moment of the debate in which there was a stronger exchange of sentences between the candidates. – After about one and a half hours of discussion, the first larger short circuit appeared. Hołownia asked Nawrocki what he arranged during a visit to Trump and was called “the clown of Polish politics”. Hołownia used this moment, adding that “nerves go”, for which Nawrocki apparently laughed. Another topic of this scuffle was the issue of taking pictures. It seems that Hołownia wanted to use this thread to cover up his recent mistake: “I am the last one who will card for taking pictures at important moments.” Nawrocki took the opportunity to remind this slip -up more directly. It is difficult to tell whose advantage this exchange of sentences – she commented on for Roach Anna Kulma.