13.2 C
London
Friday, June 14, 2024

Scarlett Johansson informed OpenAI to not use her voice — and she’s not glad they may have anyway

Must read

- Advertisement -


“Final September, I obtained a suggestion from Sam Altman, who wished to rent me to voice the present ChatGPT 4.0 system. He informed me that he felt that by my voicing the system, I may bridge the hole between tech corporations and creatives and assist shoppers to really feel comfy with the seismic shift regarding people and AI. He mentioned he felt that my voice could be comforting to folks.  

After a lot consideration and for private causes, I declined the provide. 9 months later, my pals, household and most of the people all famous how a lot the latest system named “Sky” appeared like me. 

After I heard the launched demo, I used to be shocked, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so eerily just like mine that my closest pals and information shops couldn’t inform the distinction. Mr. Altman even insinuated that the similarity was intentional, tweeting a single phrase “her” – a reference to the movie through which I voiced a chat system, Samantha, who varieties an intimate relationship with a human. 

Two days earlier than the ChatGPT 4.0 demo was launched, Mr. Altman contacted my agent, asking me to rethink. Earlier than we may join, the system was on the market.

Because of their actions, I used to be pressured to rent authorized counsel, who wrote two letters to Mr. Altman and OpenAI, setting out what that they had performed and asking them to element the precise course of by which they created the “Sky” voice. Consequently, OpenAI reluctantly agreed to take down the “Sky” voice. 

- Advertisement -

In a time after we are all grappling with deepfakes and the safety of our personal likeness, our personal work, our personal identities, I imagine these are questions that deserve absolute readability. I sit up for decision within the type of transparency and the passage of applicable laws to assist be certain that particular person rights are protected.”



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article