12.6 C
London
Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Sejm. Changes in the judiciary adopted. Hennig-Kloska: the opposition could have set the bar much higher

Must read

- Advertisement -


The Sejm has adopted changes in the judiciary, which are to lead to the payment of EU funds from the National Reconstruction Plan for Poland. In Friday’s vote, the opposition did not vote unanimously. – The opposition in Poland could have set the bar much higher than it set – assessed Paulina Hennig-Kloska, MP from Poland 2050, whose party voted against the project in “Kawa na bench”. – Maintaining unity has been a value for all democratic parties for many months – commented the Deputy Speaker of the Sejm on behalf of PSL Piotr Zgorzelski.

On Friday, the Sejm passed an amendment to the law on the Supreme Court, which, according to the authors, is to be a key “milestone” for the European Commission to unlock money from the National Reconstruction Plan. The bill will go to the Senate for work. After the vote, the head of the KO club Boris Budka he told journalists that amendments to the amendment would be adopted in the Senate, which would make obtaining funds from the KPO unquestionable.

Almost all PiS deputies voted for the draft amendment on Friday. PiS coalition partner was against – Solidarity Polandas well as Confederation and Poland 2050. The vast majority of MPs from KO, Left and KP-PSL abstained from voting.

The case in “Kawa na bench” was commented on by: Barbara Nowacka (Civic Coalition), Paulina Henning-Kloska (Poland 2050), Łukasz Schrebier (Law and Justice), Piotr Zgorzelski (Polish People’s Party – Polish Coalition), Włodzimierz Czarzasty (Left) and Paweł Sałek (President’s Chancellery).

- Advertisement -

Zgorzelski: We did not fall into the PiS trap

When asked about these arrangements by the opposition before Friday’s vote, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm Piotr Zgorzelski said that “it is obvious that the option of abstaining from voting was agreed.” – It has been a value for all democratic parties for many months to maintain the unity of the opposition parties – he added.

Zgorzelski: we couldn’t play in the PiS orchestra and vote together with Braun, Ziobro and Hołownia because then this law would have fallen TVN24

Zgorzelski also noted that “if we have been saying every day for 21 months that billions of EU funds need to be imported to stimulate the Polish economy, we could not behave differently than we did, i.e. by abstaining from voting.” – Especially since the European Commission said that the act is a step in the right direction – he noted.

– After all, we couldn’t play in the Law and Justice orchestra and vote together with [posłem Grzegorzem – red.] Braun, [ministrem Zbigniewem – red.] Ziobro and Szymon Hołownia, because then this law would fall. And if it fell, then Law and Justice would have an argument that (…) because of all those who shouted about money every day, there is no such law – he assessed.

“We didn’t fall into that trap,” he said.

Hennig-Kloska: the opposition could have set the bar much higher

Paulina Hennig-Kloska, in turn, argued that “the arrangements were that we introduce this bill to the vote, and then we work in the committee, trying to introduce our amendments.”

– Szymon Hołownia urged all opposition leaders to overturn the table of Law and Justice, because today they are ready to pay much more for money from the National Reconstruction Plan than they were ready to pay two years ago. They don’t have campaign money, but they need it badly. Today they are ready to pay much more for mobilizing funds from the National Reconstruction Plan – she noted.

In her opinion, “the opposition in Poland could have set the bar much higher than it set.” – They (PiS – ed.) had a choice: to accept a higher bar, or to cause a huge crisis in the government. And that’s what the opposition could play for. We had to play for that, she added.

Addressing the other representatives of the opposition, the MP from Poland 2050 said that “if you are so convinced that you voted well, (…) then why do you have such a grudge against Hołownia today?”. – After all, our vote did not change anything in the effectiveness of your vote. You just don’t feel well and you thought that if we were all thrown into a dirty bag, you’d feel better.

Nowacka: These were not light decisions and choices for us either

Barbara Nowacka noted that “we are talking about a divided opposition, instead of dealing with those who have full responsibility for the state, i.e. the divided rulers.” – I will not get involved in any wars on the opposition. (…) It’s not worth arguing in a TV studio to destroy the possibility of cooperation in the future. We care about a common list, we care about cooperation – she added.

– We have been saying for 21 months that money is necessary for Poland. The entire European economy is moving forward, countries are investing. Some invest in renewable energy, others in digitization, others in self-government, kindergartens, nurseries, and we stand and watch only because the arguing PiS is unable to communicate with each other, she said.

Nowacka: We do not look at politics in the tactic of one move, but ten

Nowacka: We do not look at politics in the tactic of one move, but ten TVN24

– In a moment, this bill will come back from the Senate with our amendments agreed by the entire opposition. (…) We do not intend to prevent Poles from feeling that the money can go to them, said Nowacka.

She assured that “these were not light decisions for us either, and a light choice, but it was the only obvious one to hold back to show that this team can handle it.”

Schreiber: PiS is on the side of common sense

Łukasz Schreiber was asked about Solidarna Polska’s opposition to the bill. He argued that there was no parliamentary majority in one vote, “while there is an overwhelming majority”.

– Law and Justice is primarily on the side of common sense. (…) We are not on the market in the Sejm, making some trade in exchange for support. Each MP is obliged to vote in the best faith for the bills presented, and not to trade something, he said.

Schrebier: Law and Justice is primarily on the side of common sense

Schreiber: Law and Justice is primarily on the side of common sense TVN24

Referring to the words of the Polish MP 2050 about “turning the table over” PiS, Schreiber assessed that these words suggest that “Polish interests do not matter, only turning over the table”.

This is a compromise, a difficult compromise. I think that compared to the scale of the European Commission’s expectations, compared to what the opposition is proposing, this is the most acceptable compromise – he assessed.

Czarzasty: PiS and the government should not talk about money

– PiS and the government should not comment on money, because when we voted for ratification in the Sejm, if we did not support this ratification, there would be no money. You were arguing. Without the votes of the opposition, this money would not exist – said one of the leaders of the Left, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm, Włodzimierz Czarzasty.

As one of the leaders of the opposition, Czarzasty took part in the arrangements for Friday’s vote. – The basic agreement was that the opposition would vote together. (…) In the first version there was an idea not to submit amendments at all. This idea was also supported by Mr. Hołownia. The main rule was that we should vote together – he said.

Czarzasty: if someone thinks that the law will be changed during the rule of PiS and the rule of law will be introduced, they think wrong

Czarzasty: if someone thinks that the law will be changed during the rule of PiS and the rule of law will be introduced, they think wrongTVN24

– If someone thinks that the law will be changed during the rule of PiS and the rule of law will be introduced in Poland, they think wrong. There is no rule of law, you are breaking the rule of law, therefore we will not repair the rule of law with this government and this Sejm, he said.

– If someone assumed that we would vote the way the Hołownia party voted in this matter and suddenly it would be that the PiS government would collapse or the rule of law would be repaired, it was a wrong assumption – he argued.

Sałek: The president will make decisions on this matter

– Before Christmas, the president, after he got acquainted with this project, clearly expressed his position related to the fact that the most important issue for the president is the inviolability of judges’ appointments – said the president’s minister Paweł Sałek.

Sałek: Mr. President, after the bill hits his desk, he will make a decision

Sałek: Mr. President, after the bill hits his desk, he will make a decisionTVN24

– The last link in the legislative process in Poland, and de facto the most important, is the signature of Mr. President. The President will make decisions on this matter, he added.

He also referred to last year’s presidential bill to address the milestone issue. – The president left with her due to the government’s request to join this process. Unfortunately, this process broke down, the Commission used the pretext of submitting amendments (…) and thus it came to a point where this money from the European Commission is still blocked – he assessed.



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article