12.8 C
London
Thursday, May 23, 2024

The amendment to the act on local referendum removed from the session of the Sejm. The point is important for Paweł Kukiz

Must read

- Advertisement -


Contrary to earlier announcements, the Sejm did not deal with the amendment to the Act on Local Referendum at its Friday session. The deputies were supposed to consider the Senate’s veto on this matter, but Speaker Elżbieta Witek removed this item from the agenda during the voting block.

On Friday, in the evening block of voting, the deputies were to deal with the Senate’s veto to amend the act on the local referendum, which, among other things, expands the catalog of matters that may be its subject. This regulation is an element cooperation agreement between Kukiz’15 – Paweł Kukiz’s formation – and Law and Justice. The bill adopted on March 9 was considered by the Senate on March 30 and decided to reject it.

SEE THE TEXT OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE LOCAL REFERENDUM ACT AS SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE

Before Friday’s vote, the Marshal of the Sejm Elizabeth Witek convened the Convention of Seniors, at which it informed the participants about removing this item from the agenda.

- Advertisement -

After point 35, immediately point 37.

As a result, in the plenary hall, after item 35 of the debate – the vote on the report of the Sejm committees on the Senate’s resolution on the act on the implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, on the one hand, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland Northern, on the other hand, in the field of cooperation in criminal matters – the marshal went straight to point 37. It was a vote on the report of the education and youth science committee on the Senate’s resolution on the act on establishing the University of Kalisz President Stanisław Wojciechowski.

In the order of the image published on the Sejm’s website, we read that point number 36 was the vote on the report of the administration and internal affairs committee and the local government and regional policy committee on the Senate’s resolution on the act amending the local referendum act.

Kowalski: Now we are waiting for Paweł Kukiz to give back four million zlotys

The Foundation, in which Kukiz is a member of the council, received PLN 4.3 million from the budget reserve. The money is to be used for public education on referenda. Order of the Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki issued 10 days after Kukiz complained in the media that he had no money for political activities.

Friday morning at a press conference Solidarna Polska politicians called on Paweł Kukiz to return the subsidy for the related foundation “Potrafisz Polsko!”. Solidarna Polska made any possible support for the changes in the law on the local referendum pushed by Kukiz conditional, among other things, on the return of the subsidy. – Solidarna Polska will not support this project for substantive reasons and because of the current approach Paweł Kukiz. Mr. Paweł Kukiz has to give back four million zlotys – said the deputy minister of climate and environment and spokesman of the party, Jacek Dekora.

After Friday’s block of votes, the Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, member of Solidarity Poland Janusz Kowalski was asked by journalists about the issue of the novella on the local referendum, which fell from the agenda. – Fortunately. Now we are waiting for Paweł Kukiz to give back four million zlotys – he said.

Janusz Kowalski on the point regarding the amendment to the local referendum act, which fell from the session of the SejmTVN24

Amendment to the Act on Local Referendum. What assumes

The draft amendment to the Local Referendum Act prepared by Kukiz’15 MPs was submitted to the Sejm in October 2022. The amendment was passed by the Sejm in March. Also in March, the Senate passed a resolution to reject the amendment.

It extends the catalog of issues that may be the subject of a local referendum – non-essential issues have been added, concerning social, economic or cultural ties connecting the self-government community.

A rule has been introduced according to which a referendum may be held twice during the term of office. According to one of the adopted amendments, a referendum may be held for the first time – not earlier than 18 months and not later than 24 months from the beginning of the term of office of a given body. For the second time – not earlier than 12 months and not later than 6 months before the end of the term of office of this body.

This limitation will not apply to the referendum on the dismissal of the constitutive body of the local government unit and on the dismissal of the commune head, mayor or president of the city. The amendment reduces by half the number of citizens necessary to initiate a referendum. In the case of communes and poviats, it will be 5%, not 10%. residents entitled to vote, in the case of voivodships – 2.5 percent. and not 5 percent.

The new regulations guarantee the initiators of the referendum a 6-month deadline – instead of 60 days as before – to collect signatures of residents supporting the referendum.

The amendment also extends the time limit for appealing to the administrative court a resolution of the decision-making body of the local government unit rejecting the residents’ request to hold a referendum. It also extends the deadlines: for the removal of formal deficiencies in the application for a referendum; to submit a complaint to the administrative court against the decision of the election commissioner rejecting the request for a referendum; to file an appeal.

It also makes it possible to record the work of the electoral commission with the use of cameras and cameras, and increases the number of trustees appointed to work in the electoral commission to three.

Senate’s arguments

The senators who wanted the act to be rejected in its entirety argued that it was a very low-quality legal act, and the changes introduced by it could lead, among other things, to the paralysis of local government units, because it would be possible to organize permanent referendums on dismissing the authorities. They pointed out that lowering the thresholds for the validity of referenda to 3/5 of the number of votes cast in the elections for the body being dismissed will mean that 6% of votes may be enough. entitled to dismiss a local government body.



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article