10.7 C
London
Friday, May 24, 2024

Turow Mine. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki on the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Supreme Administrative Court

Must read

- Advertisement -


Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki commented on Tuesday’s decision on the Turów mine. – We got our way. We did not listen to this bad and crazy decision of the Voivodship Administrative Court – said the head of the government.

Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki on Tuesday evening, he published a recording on Facebook in which he referred to the annulment by the Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) of the decision of the Voivodeship Administrative Court (WSA) to suspend the implementation of the environmental decision for Turów.

– We got our way. We did not listen to this bad and crazy decision of the Provincial Administrative Court regarding the closure of the power plant and Turów mine, i.e. closing a huge piece of our energy system. 7 percent. Where does the heat for homes come from? Also from there – said Prime Minister Morawiecki in the recording. – We did not allow ourselves to be blackmailed by eco-terrorists from the West, z German mainly, because Poland is right in this dispute, added the head of the government, emphasizing that “we won this dispute”.

WSA at the end of May this year. suspended – pending the examination of the relevant complaint – the implementation of the environmental decision regarding the concession for coal mining for the mine in Turów after 2026. It should be remembered that the spokesperson of the court stated at that time that the decision issued by the Provincial Administrative Court did not suspend the operation of the Turów mine.

- Advertisement -

Turów Mine – complaint against the environmental decision

That decision of the Voivodeship Administrative Court was invalid and three appeals against it were filed. In the first half of June, it was reported that GDOŚ and PGE GiEK filed such complaints. At that time, the National Prosecutor’s Office informed about joining the case before the administrative court and filing its own complaint.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Administrative Court annulled the decision of the Provincial Administrative Court.

As the spokesman for the Supreme Administrative Court, Judge Sylwester Marciniak, stated in the justification for the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court, it was indicated that the court of first instance, when examining applications, should take into account the consequences of implementing the decision not only in the context of the complainant’s situation, but also take into account the broadly understood public interest and the interests of other parties to the proceedings. – In this case, the voivodship court did not make such an assessment of the applicants’ applications and the arguments of the investor and the authority – noted the spokesman for the Supreme Administrative Court.

– The court emphasized that there is no doubt that energy security is a constitutional value, because it is one of the guarantees of state independence and security of citizens – said the spokesman for the Supreme Administrative Court.

As he added, “in this case, the course of the investment process excluded the possibility of effectively suspending the implementation of the decision on environmental conditions, which was omitted by the court of first instance.”

Tuesday’s decision does not end the case of the Turów mine. The actual complaint against the environmental decision – in connection with which the Provincial Administrative Court issued a decision to suspend the execution of this decision – is to be examined by the Voivodeship Administrative Court on 31 August this year.

The case concerns the decision of the General Directorate of Environmental Protection of September 30, 2022 specifying the environmental conditions for the implementation of the project: “Continuation of exploitation of the Turów lignite deposit, implemented in the Bogatynia commune”. Complaints against the environmental decision were filed, among others, by Frank Bold Foundation, Greenpeace and EKO-UNIA Ecological Association.

Main photo source: DarSzach/Shutterstock



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article