American decision Supreme Court It applies to employees of defense departments, agriculture, internal affairs, energy, treasury and veterans. It's about 16 thousand officialswho were employed there for a trial period.
The court stated that non-profit organizations that filed a lawsuit did not have the so-called procedural ID (i.e. the right to bring the case) in a case regarding the dismissals of federal employees.
USA. The Supreme Court allowed mass exemptions. “Deep disappointment”
The coalition of plaintiffs and co -depths issued a statement regarding the Tuesday decision of the Supreme Court, calling it “failure”. However, they announced that “This battle is far from the end“.
“There is no doubt that thousands of public service employees was unlawfully released In order to paralyze federal agencies and their key programs that serve millions of Americans every day, “they said.
“Today's decision of the United States Supreme Court is deeply disappointingbut it is only a temporary break in our efforts to enforce the orders of the Court of First Instance and pull the federal government to be responsible, “he added.
Mass exemptions in the USA. The offices alert about chaos
In recent months, the president's administration Donald Trumpin cooperation with Elon Musk In Jego Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)carried out mass exemptions at various federal agencies in the United States. The purpose of these activities is to reduce costs and increase the efficiency of public administration.
These extensive layoffs and restructuring They meet with criticism both from employees and experts. They are afraid that the reduction of staff in key agencies may negatively affect the quality of services rendered public and the government's ability to perform its basic functions.
In the plaintiffs addressed to the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs emphasized that the mass dismissals of employees on the trial period led to serious and long -term interference in the functioning of key federal institutions.
The situation in the veterans department, which has already struggled with chronic staff shortages. Exemptions – as indicated – had and still have serious, negative consequences for the quality of services provided to veterans.