13.9 C
London
Friday, April 25, 2025

Debate in Końskie. Politicians comment. “Other candidates saved Karol Nawrocki”

Must read

- Advertisement -


“Karol Nawrocki, however, caught a little before the debate 1 on 1”

Source: tvn24

Karol Nawrocki, however, caught a little one on one on one -on -one debate – said MP Monika Rosa in “Coffee on the bench” on TVN24, referring to the debate that took place on Friday in Końskie. According to MP Aleksandra Leo (Poland 2050), thanks to the Sejm Marshal Szymon Hołownia, most key candidates were debated. According to PiS MP Marcin Horała, the candidate of his grouping, Karol Nawrocki, showed “character, the format of the head of state”.

- Advertisement -

On Friday evening, a presidential debate took place in Końskie with the participation of eight candidates. You can read more about what they said here – “Do you take money from Putin.” Three main topics, sharp short circuits.

Rafał Trzaskowski proposed one on one on one Karol NawrockiHowever, after several applicants declared their arrival in the city, the candidate KOk proposed to expand the format.

See also our relationship on tvn24.pl >>>

On Sunday, in “Coffee on the bench”, the debate was commented on by politicians-MP KO Monika Rosa, Left MP Daria Gosek-Popiołek, Polish MP 2050-expensive road Aleksander Leo, PiS MP Marcin Horała, MP of the European Parliament from the Confederation Stanisław Tyszka and the President's advisor Andrzej DudaAndrzej Zybertowicz.

“The main person who was attacked during the debate was Trzaskowski”

MP Rosa rated the debate as “very interesting”. – I think she added color to the election campaign. Everyone complained that there was no emotion. Emotions appeared in the debate and around the debate, and already during the debate. Rafał Trzaskowskithere is probably no surprise here, he did very well, he showed the presidential format. Substantive answers, it was really great – she said.

She also mentioned the events before the debate. – It was Karol Nawrocki who constantly called Rafał Trzaskowski to the debate, flexed muscles, and when a clear answer came from Rafał Trzaskowski that 'well, let's meet, horse debate, debate', suddenly some problems began to pile up, some doubts that you need some PIS media militias to ask. This discussion and ultimately the debate looked so that there were several candidates, three hours – Rosa said.

In her opinion, “Karol Nawrocki, however, caught a little before one -on -one debate.” – The other candidates saved Karol Nawrocki from the debate with Rafał Trzaskowski. And it is not surprising that the main person who was attacked during the debate was Rafał Trzaskowski – as a leader of trust, as a leader in pollsas the one who enters the second round. He answered with culture, stood in his position, clear values, clear views, a clear vision of Poland – summed up the MP.

Trzaskowski “from the welcome was a topus”

According to MP Horała “Karol Nawrocki showed primarily character and built this contrast with Rafał Trzaskowski.” – He went to the Lion cave. Rafał Trzaskowski thought what to do for 15 days. He is challenged for a debate – how to organize it so that it is 100 percent safe. Selected television, bodyguards cordon and even in their greenhouse, conditions they designed, in a debate that was not a debate, because as we find out, she was an event of the staff of Rafał Trzaskowski's staff – he managed to lose – he assessed.

He stated that Nawrocki “simply shows the character, the format of the head of the state.” – Rafał Trzaskowski, unfortunately, is a person who was such a topus, our Rafałek, wonderful, loved, married – said PiS MP.

“Pathodebata”

MEP Tyszka referred to the fact that the confederation candidate Sławomir Mentzen did not appear on the debate. – A serious politician seriously treats citizens and voters. Sławomir Mentzen was arranged for four meetings in Podkarpacie a long time ago and was at these meetings. He was not invited to the debate – he said.

He estimated that “it was a pathodebata, it was a circus, it was a cabaret.” – It was a mockery of the Polish state and voters. It was offensive to voters – he added.

– We all know that the only phenomenon of this campaign, a distinctive phenomenon is the growing popularity of Sławomir Mentzen and amazing crowds, whom no politician for thirty years has not attracted to meetings consistently all over Poland. There was no such phenomenon in Poland for thirty years – said Tyszka. In his opinion, “they see other bars and wonder what to do.” – Trzaskowski's staff came up with such an idea – let's make a debate with Nawrocki in order to pull Nawrocki to the second round, because Nawrocki is safer. Because Trzaskowski with Mentzen will lose in the second round. Therefore, at this point, the mainstream will play Nawrocki and against Mentzen, “he said.

He also turned to MPs from other coalition parties. – I am very surprised to the ladies as representatives of the left and the third way that you let yourself be humiliated. On Polish Television they say that you are a political plankton and so on and so on. Insult your candidates. Why do you legitimize the same thing that PiS did with Polish Television? We all finance it. This should be supra -art, supra -political. Do not be humiliated to Tusk and Trzaskowski – he said.

Hołownia “seated such different people at one table”

MP Leo stated that the debate took place “thanks to the Sejm Marshal Szymon Hołownia.” – Earlier we had a situation where there was to be one debate on the market, in fact organized by Karol Nawrocki, the second debate in the hall, de facto organized by Rafał Trzaskowski – she said. – meanwhile Szymon Hołowniacolloquially speaking, he got into these both events and said that there would be no laws of two candidates with the highest support, because they are not polls, they are not experts, it is not political parties that decide who will debate. People have the right to hear all candidates – she said.

– And something very important happened. The marshal managed not to overturn the table, just like one of the candidates wants to do, because turning the table is not art, you only need a little physical strength. He managed something much more valuable, but also difficult – sit at one table of such different people with different views, so that viewers could hear, could see a confrontation, a real confrontation. Thanks to this, this campaign finally woke up – Leo summed up.

“This is not a real democracy”

According to MP Gosek-Popiołek, “Duopol” was broken. – I understand that platform and law and justice want to strengthen this duopoly, to show that there are no alternatives. That democracy is really the moment when we choose between one and the other political party. Only this is not a real democracy – she noted.

– It was also important that program divisions were clearly outlined. That is, Rafał Trzaskowski is the one who will sign the act introducing subsidies for developers. Rafał Trzaskowski is the one who will not sign the act regulating and limiting the sale of alcohol at gas stations – said the left representative.

She also referred to the words that Trzaskowski during the debate was “attacked” by other candidates. – No, they were asked by other candidates, for example by Magda Biejat, specific questions – she said. – Because voters and election have the right to know, for example, what is the view of the leader when it comes to the issue of, for example, health contributions. What is his plan for his candidacy. This is not an attack, it is simply a conversation – she added.

“Nawrocki learns public transport”

According to Zybertowicz, “you can see how Karol Nawrocki learns public transport.” He reminded that during the presentation of the candidate in the “Sokół” hall Nawrocki read from the card.

– By the way, when he was supposed to enter, I thought – God, that he would only have a card. Because the emotions were so powerful that I was afraid that if I were in his place, I would run out of language in my mouth – said Zybertowicz.

– He read from the card, then at the convention for a long time he presented an extensive program of 21 points. And now he was doing even better here. Not perfect, but even better – he assessed. He added, however, that he could not watch the debate in full, but he saw her fragments and read the analyzes.



Source link

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article