Having already been pinged for 3 monitor limits breaches earlier within the race, Norris locking up and taking to the run-off at Flip 3 was deemed sufficient to earn him a five-second penalty.
It’s a state of affairs the place Norris thinks some frequent sense must be utilized if drivers aren’t going to be deterred from making an attempt overtakes.
“It’s fairly foolish, to be sincere,” mentioned Norris in regards to the monitor limits state of affairs. “I’ve tried to do an overtake, I’ve locked up, I’ve gone off the monitor simply, and tried then to keep away from the sausage kerb.
“Then instantly I gave the place again to Max, so I most likely misplaced a second and a half in doing that. It is clearly not a penalty. I’ve misplaced out in doing such a factor.
“These types of issues will keep away from individuals racing. If you don’t need us to race and don’t need me to attempt to overtake and have a boring race, then you’ll be able to have these guidelines.”
Lando Norris, McLaren F1 Group
Picture by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images
With the monitor limits situation prone to be mentioned within the numerous group managers and drivers’ conferences at Silverstone this weekend, Norris hoped that there was sufficient consensus for the principles to be modified.
“I am positive it is one thing that has already been introduced up as a result of there is a distinction between going off monitor and gaining a bonus and going off since you’ve made a foolish mistake and you have not judged one thing completely.
“The actual fact you get punished for that, particularly in a racing state of affairs, particularly when I’ve given up much more time, it simply does not make sense. So, it’s one thing I hope they repair shortly.”
Norris has discovered some allies within the opinion that getting a monitor limits penalty for making a mistake whereas battling for place isn’t proper.
The Japanese mentioned: “In Barcelona, I feel I went large at Flip 1 and since I used to be battling with one other automobile and compelled large. Clearly, I took the best [escape] highway to rejoin to the monitor subsequent to the bollard and I adopted the principles, however they took it as a monitor limits [penalty].
“I imply, I did not acquire something. Clearly, I let the automobile move and in the long run, I rejoined the automobile behind. I had two events [already and] they counted that as monitor limits.
Max Verstappen, Crimson Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, battle for the lead
Picture by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images
“I can not perceive why we use that as a monitor limits. It is simply ridiculous, that rule.”
Policing clarification
Whereas there are not any grounds to go over that particular incident anymore with the FIA, the Australian thinks there are points that want addressing for the long run.
“I feel for me there’s two factors,” he mentioned. “I feel the primary one is that if there may be house for a automobile to go off, that we monitor it in a good approach.
“The proof that led to my lap being deleted was from a helicopter that was solely on me for that lap, which is a bit painful when there are different those who probably additionally went off that did not have a helicopter on them. So, I feel it is a very wonderful line
“Then there are some discussions we have to have [about solutions], however the best solution to eliminate that’s make the white line 20cm wider and never have to fret about it in any respect.”