“Coffee for the bench” after the debate in Końskie. Schetyna: Nawrocki “in a collision with Rafał Trzaskowski would not survive”

Nawrocki in a clash with Rafał Trzaskowski would not have a chance, the Civic Platform candidate was keying, thanks to Biejat, important things were sounded, and Hołownia spoke to all Poles – this is how the Friday debate was assessed in the program “jokes on the bench” politicians of the largest parliamentary clubs.

On Friday, a presidential debate took place in the sports hall in Końskie. Rafał Trzaskowski, Karol Nawrocki, answered the questions for three hours, Szymon HołowniaMagdalena Biejat, Joanna Senyszyn, Marek Jakubiak, Krzysztof Stanowski and Maciej Maciak.

See the entire debate in Końskie

Grzegorz Schetyna from the Civic Coalition in the program “Kawala na bench” on TVN24 asked if it was good that Rafał Trzaskowski's staff accepted the invitation of Karol Nawrocki to participate in the debate, he said: “It was worth it, because the campaign began today.” “With all these circumstances, nerves, emotions and maybe sometimes exaggerated with scuffles,” he added, referring to events in front of the hallin which the debate took place.

– We saw that the leaders were looking for a formula and it was live. I don't remember such a debate nearly 3 hours. There was to be a debate of two politicians, and it was necessary to multiply four times and broaden the volume of time, and it was unexpected, but I think it was necessary – he assessed.

The Citizens' Coalition politician assessed that the debate was important because she drew attention to the election campaign and the importance of the presidential election.

Schetyna also assessed that the debate showed that “the absent are wrong” and “Mentzen and Zandberg will be the losers.” He added that “he was surprised by the complete program Flaut Karol Nawrocki”. – He is not prepared to answer. In the one -on -one variant with a collision with Rafał Trzaskowski he would not survive this today – he said.

Then he turned to Marcin Horała with PISthat “you should thank my colleagues, that there were more people and there was less time to show the difference in levels and knowledge about politics.”

Horała: Trzaskowski was key

– First of all, Karol Nawrocki is credible in his statement. If Karol Nawrocki says he is against the migration pact, he is against: he was today, yesterday and the day before yesterday – said Marcin Horała of Law and Justice.

– As Krzysztof Stanowski rightly noted, today a more right -wing Rafał Trzaskowski drew, which is ashamed of flags LGBTunder which he marched through Warsaw many times, but after Mrs. Magdalena Biejat took her from him, at the end Mr. Trzaskowski, when asked about another matter, began to speak, as he would promote LGBT rights – he commented.

-In principle, it is in every case: law-left, law-leather. Karol Nawrocki rightly asked, actually who is Mr. Rafał Trzaskowski and what views he has at all and what he thinks, whether he is rainbow or green. Probably yes, but he was a bit ashamed during the debate and he was asleep as he could – he concluded.

Górska: Thanks to the Biejat, important things were sounded

Senator Anna Górska from the left said that the staff of Magdalena Biejat decided to go to Końskie to “remind you that where public television has a share, not to consolidate polarization, which is a nuisance of our political scene.”

– In the end, it is good that the debate took place and I am very happy with this debate and the attitude of our candidate, because I think that she did a huge job, sounded important things and made this debate about something – she assessed.

She added that Magdalena Biejat “introduced the language of values, postulates and positions that resonated in society.”

Hetman: Hołownia spoke to all Poles

MEP Krzysztof Hetman From the Polish People's Party, he admitted that there is no doubt that “in direct contact, Marshal Szymon Hołownia is the best of all candidates.” – He proved it. He was calm, substantive and extremely precise – he assessed.

– It was clearly and clearly visible that Mr. Marshal Hołownia spoke to all Poles, because Mr. Rafał Trzaskowski and Mr. Karol Nawrocki spoke to his electorates, and Mrs. Magdalena Biejat fought with Mr. Zandberg, Mrs. Senyszyn wanted to remind you of her existence, Mr. Stanowski did a happening, and Mr. Maciak only proved that sometimes the decision to candidate is a bad idea and sometimes the decision to be a presidential and Sometimes it is better to stay in an armchair at home – he concluded.

– Szymon Hołownia showed up in the best version in which it is always and we could all see it – he added.

Wawer: Mentzen is a threat to Duopol prevailing in Poland

– This entire debate was one great tribute to the success of Sławomir Mentzen and the expression of panic, especially the gentlemen of Nawrocki and Trzaskowski before the threat of Sławomir Mentzen for Duopol prevailing in Poland – said Michał Wawer from the confederation.

Sławomir Mentzen did not take part in the debate. In social media he explainedthat he has already arranged meetings with voters in other places.

– Everything in this debate was organized so that by accident Sławomir Mentzen failed to reach the debate. Although at 2pm we had photos that there were rostrums for more than two candidates, that there is a room prepared for a debate of several or a dozen or so, it wasn't until 18:20 Rafał Trzaskowski officially invited everyone to participate – he said.