Presidential election 2025. Debate in Końskie. Aleksander Kwasniewski evaluated the candidates

On the one hand, I saw heavily paralyzed favorites, who – I had such an impression – came to this debate above all, so as not to lose. On the other hand, I saw three candidates who took advantage of the chance – said former president Aleksander Kwasniewski in “Facts after Facts” on TVN24, commenting on the debate in Końskie.

Aleksander Kwasniewski He spoke in “Facts after Facts” on TVN24 about how Friday's debate in Presidential in Końskie can affect the further course of the campaign. He stated that she had restored the “temperature of this campaign”.

– I think Końskie turned out to be absolutely a factor dynamizing this campaign, but I don't think Game Changer. I do not think that these posts (survey – ed.) Somehow have changed radically. Maybe two people will gain a bit on it, but this balance of power – two main favorites and the rest – a lot – he said.

– However, this is paradoxically interesting for me that once again it turns out that Poles are masters of improvisation. Because the debate made of nothing, it is not known to whose invitation, it is not known how many participants will be and so on, it turned out to be quite interesting – he added.

Kwasniewski: Two people who can improve their quotations

– On the one hand, I saw heavily paralyzed favorites who – I got such an impression – they came to this debate above all, not to lose, not to lose, I am talking about Trzaskowski and Nawrocki. And (I saw – ed.) Three candidates who took advantage of the chance – he continued.

Kwasniewski said that “Szymon Hołownia used for sure (opportunity – ed.), Who feels great in television formats and showed how good he is with it.” – And he showed courage, because he broke the idea, which was at the beginning (to debate only two candidates – ed.) – he pointed out.

According to Kwasniewski, “Magdalena Biejat came out wonderfully, who had the opportunity to show herself as a mature politician with a thoughtful program and with a great reflex.” – because taking over this flag LGBT It was a reflex, but excellent – he added, referring here to the takeover of the LGBT flag, which Karol Nawrocki set for Rafał Trzaskowski.

The former president assessed that Joanna Senyszyn also did well, who “with all her coloring passed the arguments with which it is often difficult to disagree.” “They were very common sense and serious,” he added. According to Kwasniewski, “Leaders retained the position” A “two people who can improve their quotations” after this debate it is Magdalena Biejat and Szymon Hołownia.

Kwasniewski: Mentzen and Zandberg were wrong in the assessment

As two losers, Kwasniewski pointed out Sławomir Mentzen and Adrian Zandberg absent.

– I think they were wrong in the assessment. They were convinced that nothing would come out of it – that it would be a circus, chaos, a party that would ridicule itself. It turned out that a pretty good debate came out – he commented.